I’m not going to get too deep here with these books because they’re still popular and I’d hate to spoil anything.
These books are like The Running Man + Survivor (the TV show, not the ’70s rock group) + The Lord of the Flies + something else (but I forget what I wanted to put here. Was it Star Wars?)
The Hunger Games was really good. Great story, great pacing, compelling page-turner. Read this one and then stop, if you can.
Catching Fire was more of the same, still page-turning but it had a cliff-hanger ending that really did nothing for the book.
Mockingjay was redundant times three, and way too long. The ending to the whole thing was fine. I had no problems with the ending (I didn’t care who she ended up with, to be honest. I just wanted the whole damn thing to end.)
All of these books were DARK. Super dark. I mean, the whole premise is kids having to kill each other for entertainment. I’m not sure we can get much darker.
And now for ten (9) things: WARNING: SPOILERS.
10. These books are filled, FILLED, with the mental and physical torture of children. I felt guilty for reading them, really.
9. I really liked Katniss. UNTIL I DIDN’T. The author kind of beats her with a dead horse.
8. I really liked Peeta. UNTIL I DIDN’T. See above.
7. There are 6,000 characters in these books.
6. There is no number six. If there were a number six it would be about Katniss’s mother.
5. I liked the superficiality of the Capitol versus the blue-collar Districts thing that went on. It really added some “comedy” to this tragedy.
4. The President Snow thing, was fine. There, of course, needs to be a bad guy. The President Coin thing? Was too much. (I’m not saying that that’s not how it would be in real life. I mean, our own presidential elections are really just pick who you think will be less evil, right?) This added nothing to the book, it made the ending more complicated, and it was rushed. The author could leave Coin as a lesser-of-two-evils, which is realistic, and the ending would have been much tighter.
3. So much torture and murder. I feel gross. The extreme mental torture and damage to these kids is just… ugh. It’s not fun to read.
2. Near the end (oh my gosh Mockingjay had so many near-endings.) when the five or six of them are voting on whether or not to exact justice on the Capitol by making them have a Hunger Games every year, and Katniss votes yes? For Prim? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? So then the vote is yea. But then… later on in the ending… it isn’t? What? Then why even have that vote? it’s sloppy and unnecessary and should have been edited.
1. Prim dies anyway. Well, fuck you too.
The Hunger Games gets 2 Cansecos and the other two get 50. Oh wait. I’m doing Roxy heads now. That’s different.
The Hunger Games gets four Roxies:
The other two books still get 50 Cansecos:
5 Comments
Hmmm…I have a question for you in your capacities as both a reviewer and a librarian. I have noticed that when I read “DARK” fiction (and I rarely read non-fiction – as I figure why waster my recreation time) – that my mood reflects what I am reading. Sometimes that creates a dark/anxious mood for me and impacts me and those around me. Which doesn’t detract from the quality of the story – but does detract from the quality of my life while I am in the middle of the story. Is it possible to find really compelling stories – the “can’t possibly put it down until I must go to work or lose my job” sort of story that isn’t truly dark? I think that may be a philosophical question – but am not sure. If you know of such a series of books, or authors who write such books, would you share? Thanks!! My friends and family would appreciate it!!
“Waster” – new word, I guess. Typo…sorry!
Jeanne, I am so with you on this.
I’ve noticed that I can read noir and shake it off pretty quickly (within a day). But if it’s something truly dark, like these books, and I think maybe it has something to do with children being involved, it does take longer to get over the down feeling.
I think that’s why I really dig the swedish/scandinavian fiction so much, it’s often moody, but it’s never hopeless.
If you like noir and haven’t tried any of Dennis Lehane’s stuff, you might give it a go. He has a series as well as some great stand-alones.
I do find that I’ll temper my moody reads with a dishy biography (Hello, new Jackie-O book!) or something about baseball. Reading about baseball makes me really happy, especially if it’s written well.
What kind of stuff have you been reading lately? I need to branch out! (I refuse to read Amish fiction though.)
I am really big into SciFi/Fantasy. I also like Mysteries and Espionage. So it may be just my choice of books that shoots me in the foot. For light fare I enjoy M.C Beaton, and always enjoyed Rosamund Pilchner and Maeve Binchy. But I don’t seem to see those kinds of light stories out there and these two have pretty much retired. I like Robert Jordan and Terry Goodkind in the Fantasy and S/F world and things like they produce. Also John Scalzi’s Old Man’s War is pretty thought provoking. Sometimes it takes constructing a whole new world to get us to think of a new concept as reasonable enough to give it actual thought, I find.
I will try Dennis Lehane! I liked the Sig Larsen books very much. Are they in the same category?
The Girl With the Dragon tattoo books were okay? but they’re not the same kind of moodiness that I like. I really like Johan Theorin. He only has two books that have been translated into english though. But they are so good.
Have you read any Lois McMaster Bujold? I’ve not read her sci-fi stuff but i’ve read a couple of her fantasy books. I thought they had good love stories in them.
Oh, and if you haven’t read Betsy Tobin’s Ice Land, give it a go. I don’t know what made me try it, it’s not my usual, but man, it was so good. I even got Liz to read it. and SHE really liked it too.
I wouldn’t say that Dennis Lehane and Stig Larrsson are in the same catergory. The Lehane books are not as confusing or slow or bogged down with a bajillion details or sandwiches.